فرص ومعوقات تطبيق منهجية الکايزن في ضوء تصورات أعضاء هيئة التدريس بجامعة المجمعة

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلف

کلية العلوم والدرسات الانسانية برماح - جامعة المجمعة

المستخلص

The current study seeks to shed light on the Kaizen methodology and related concepts, and to identify the opportunities and obstacles of their application from the viewpoint of the faculty members in Majmaah University. The questionnaire was developed through Google applications, and follow-up monitoring and analysis of responses using SPSS, where the responses valid for statistical analysis were 326 questionnaires. The most important results of the study is that the assessment of the members about the phases of the quality circle in general is relatively 2 medium, although the highest concentration with planning and then implementation, then review, and the correction of errors at the least, Substantial differences were found between the estimates of members on each stage of the quality circle according to the experience and age of the faculty member and the nature of the work, while the existence of gender differences was limited to the planning stage. The most important recommendations of the study are: spreading the culture of Kaizen and the participation of employees in the mechanisms and means of activating them and taking into account the differences in abilities, attitudes and experiences, focusing on the mechanisms of implementing the tasks in the best way in the way of improvement, follow-up methodically between the stages of the quality department without time intervals, and preparing further studies in field of Kaizen at another universities and applying them to categories other than faculty members of employees and students or to mix those categories.

الكلمات الرئيسية

الموضوعات الرئيسية


1- Alhawat, A. Al-awami, M., & Said, B. (2004), The march of Libyan higher education: achievements and ambitions. General syndication of University Staff Members, Tripoli. 2- Amit, K. A. & Suraj, C. (2015), Assissing the application of Kaizen Principles in Indian smal-scale Industry, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 6 (4), pp 369-396. 3- Asaad, Mohd Norhasni Mohd, Rohaizah Saad, Rushami Zien Yusoff, (2005), 5S, Kaizen and Organization Performance: Examining the Relationship and Level of Implementation Using Rasch Model in Malaysian Automotive Company, International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology 1(2) PP 214-226. 4- Avari, A., Zulkifli, N. & Yusuff, F. M. (2011), Evaluation of approaches to strategy in Lean Manufacturing and safety management systems and clarification of the relationship between them, World Applied Sciences Journal, 15(1), pp 19-26. 5- Becker, J. E. (2001), Implementing 5S: to promote safety & housekeeping, Professional safety, 46(8), pp 29-31. 6- Chapman, D. E. & Gallagher, M. (2005), Clean House with lean 5S, Quality progress, 38(6), pp 27-32. 7- Dysko, D. (2012), GEMBA KAIEN: Utilization of human potential to achievement continuous improvement of company, The International Transport & Logistics, Vol. 12, ISSN: 1451-107X, pp 42-64. 8- Feijoo, A., Ace-Farina, Suarez, R. Maceiras (2014), Improvement of Quality Management in Higher Education through KAIZEN 5S Technique, International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, ISSN: 2340- 1117, pp 915-920. 9- Gratiela, Dana BOCA (2011), kaizen method in production management, International Scientific Conference Young Scientists. 33 10- Imai, M., (2013), Gemba Kaizen: A Commonsense Approach to a Continuous Improvement Strategy, McGraw Hill, New York, Second Edition. 11- Jignesh A. Bhoi, Darshak A. Desai, Rohit M. Patel, (2014), The Concept & Methodology of Kaizen A Review Paper, International Journal of Engineering Development and Research, Vol. 2, Issue 1, ISSN: 2321-9939. 12- Joshi, A. (2013), Implementation of Kaizen as a continuous improvement tool: A Case study, International Journal of Management Research and IT, ISSN: 2320-0065, pp 1-29. 13- Karkoszka, T., Honorowicz, J. (2009), Kaizen philosophy a manner of continuous improvement of processes and products, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering 35/2. pp 197-203. 14- Keeley, E. J., (2004), Institutional research as the catalyst for the extent and effectiveness of knowledge-management practices in improving planning and decision-making in higher education organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Arizona: Northcentral University, [en ligne] disponibe sur sunzi.lib.hku.hk/ER/detail/hkul/3518550 15- Liuxing, Taso, P. L., Patrick Rau and Liang Ma, (2015), "development of a Quick Instrument Measuring Kaizen Culture (for Chinese)", Procedia Manufacturing, Vol. 3, pp 4703- 4715. 16- Manuel, F. S. B., Juan, R. P., & Laoucine, K., (2011), Thoughts of Kaizen and its evaluation three different perspectives and guiding principles, international Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 2(4), pp 288-308. 17- Masaaki, Imai: Gemba Kaizen- A Commonsense Low – cost Approach to Management New York, McGraw- Hill, 1997, pp 19-22. 18- Osterling, Mike, (2014), Lean Kaizen: A Simplified Approach to Process, Enna.com. 19- Randhawa, J. S., and Ahuja, I. S. (2017), "Evaluating impact of 5S implementation on business performance", 34 International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 66, No. 7, pp 948-978. 20- Sevtap, C., (2015), Development of a tool to measure the effectiveness of kaizen events within the wood products industry, Master of Science, the faculty of the Virginia polytechnic Institute and State university. 21- Swafy, A. & Ghatass, B. (2003), Training Students in Business Institutions: Trail Analysis and Development Requirements. Arabic Congregation for Developing Management and Trade Facilities in the Arab Universities. Halab, Syria, 11-13 March. 22- Thalner, Deborah, (2005), The Practice of continuous Improvement in Higher Education, Western Michigan Leadership, USA, pp 15-38. 23- Thessaloniki, R., (2006), KAIZEN: Definition & Principles in brief: A Concept & Tool for employees in evolvement. www.michailolidis.gr. 24- Titu, M., Oprean, C. and Grecu, D. (2010), Applying the Kaizen Method and the 5S Technique in the Activity of Post-Sale Services in the Knowledge-Based Organization. The International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists (3), Hong Kong. 25- Warwood, S. J., and Knowles, G. (2004), "An investigation into Japanese 5‐S practice in UK industry", The TQM Magazine, Vol. 16, No. 5, pp 347-353.