هل تحقق البراعة التنظيمية أداء وظيفي أفضل ؟دراسة تطبيقية في الشرکات الصناعية الصغيرة والمتوسطة في المنطقة الصناعية بمدينة دمياط الجديدة

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلفون

1 کلية التجارة - جامعة المنصورة

2 کلية تالعلوم التطبيقية - جامعة حضر موت

المستخلص

Abstract This research aims to study the effect of organizational Ambidexterity on job performance, from the point of view of managers and their deputies in the small and medium industrial companies, in the industrial zone of New Damietta. A special survey questionnaire has been designed for this purpose and distributed to the study sample, which was a sample quota. The number of companies under study reached (512) companies, and the sample size was (384) individuals, the questionnaire was distributed to them. The good ones were for statistical analysis (198) questionnaires. The results showed a significant correlation between search variables, and that there is a significant effect of a dimension of organizational Ambidexterity on the dimensions of job performance, which is dimension exploitation at a significant level of 0.01, While dimension exploration had no significant effect on the dimensions of functionality, From the point of view of managers and their deputies in the companies under study. And the value (R²) was 0.27, 0.28, and 0.21 in the dimensions of job performance (task performance, contextual performance, and Creative performance) respectively

الموضوعات الرئيسية


1- Ahuja, G., & Morris Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic management journal, 22(6‐7), 521-543. 2- Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1),221-232. 3- Alnawafleh, E. A. T., Halim, M. S. B. A., & Tambi, A. M. B. A. (2018). The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices, Organizational Culture, Motivation and Knowledge Management on Job Performance with Leadership Style as Moderating Variable in the Jordanian Commercial Banks Sector. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 6, 477-488. 4- Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717. 5- Atteya, N. (2012). Testing the Impact of the Human Resource Management Practices on Job Performance: An Empirical Study in the Egyptian Joint Venture Petroleum Companies. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9), 105-119. 6- Atuahene-Gima, k. (2005). Resolving the capability—rigidity paradox in new product innovation. Journal of marketing,69(4),61-83. 7- Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative science quarterly, 47(4), 676-707. 8- Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. M. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. Chapter in N. Schmitt and W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations, 71-98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Business & Management Series. 9- Brownlee, A. L. (1999). Motivational effects of accountability and recognition on task and contextual performance. Doctoral dissertation, Florida University. 10- Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 313-333 11- Caniëls, M. C., & Veld, M. (2016). Employee ambidexterity, high performance work systems and innovative work behavior: How much balance do we need? The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 30(4), 565-585. 12- Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20(4), 781-796. 13- Chambers II, R. J. (2016). Evaluating indicators of job performance: Distributions and types of analyses. Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana Tech University. 14- Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of marketing, 64(3), 1-17. 18 15- Cho, H. and Pucik, V. (2005), Relationship between innovativeness, quality, growth, profitability, and market value. Strategic Management Journal, 26(6), pp.555-575 16- Clifford, K. M., Andersen, H. L., & Giæver, T. J. (2013). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in the Service Sector: Ambidexterity in a Norwegian Company with a Value Shop Configuration. Master thesis, Norway University. 17- Dane, E., & Brummel, B. J. (2013). Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention. Human relations, 67 (1), 105– 128. 18- De Stobbeleir, K. E., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811-831. 19- Enkel, E., Heil, S., Hengstler, M., & Wirth, H. (2017). Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation, 60, 29-38. 20- Fluegge, E. R. (2008). Who put the fun in functional? Fun at work and its effects on job performance. Doctoral dissertation, Florida University. 21- Fourné, S. (2014). Managing organizational tensions: A multi-level perspective on exploration, exploitation and ambidexterity. Doctoral dissertation, Erasmus University. 22- Fu, N., Flood, P. C., & Morris, T. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity and professional firm performance: the moderating role of organizational capital. Journal of Professions and Organization, 3(1), 1-16 23- Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226. 24- Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. 2010. Multivariate data analysis, 7 th edition, New York: Prentice Hall. 25- Halldorsson, F. (2008). Leadership style, employee job performance, and organizational outcomes. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota. 26- Hess, A.M. & Rothaermel, F.T. (2011) When are assets complementary? Star scientists, strategic alliances, and innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 895- 909. 27- Hill, S.A., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Strategy-organization configurations in corporate venture units: Impact on performance and survival. Journal of Business Venturing, 23: 423-444. 28- Isobe, T., Makino, S., & Montgomery. D., (2004). Exploitation, Exploration, and firm performance: the case of small manufacturing firm in Japa .Research Collection Lee Kong Chian School of Business. 29-Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management science, 52(11), 1661-1674. 19 30-Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of applied psychology, 86(5), 984-996. 31-Junni, P., Sarala, R. M., Taras, V., & Tarba, S. Y. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity and performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 299-312. 32- Kahya, E. (2009). The effects of job performance on effectiveness. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(1), 96-104. 33- Kelidbari, H. R. R., Fadaei, M., & Ebrahimi, P. (2016). The role of ethical leadership on employee performance in Guilan University of medical sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 463-470. 34- Ketkar, S., & Puri, R. (2017). Ambidextrous Human Resource Practices and Employee Performance. Proceedings of International Conference on Strategies in Volatile and Uncertain Environment for Emerging Markets, July 14-15, 2017, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi. 35- Kiyani, A. A., Ayupp, K., & Rasool, S. (2018). Exploring the construct of task performance of academicians in an Asian context: teaching is different from research. In Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholar ship, Emerald Publishing Limited, 6(1), 25-38. 36- Kollmann, T., & Stöckmann, C. (2012). Filling the Entrepreneurial Orientation Performance Gap: The Mediating Effects of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovations. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 38(5), 1001-1026. 37- Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Schaufeli, W. B., de Vet Henrica, C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2011). Conceptual frameworks of individual work performance: a systematic review. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 53(8), 856-866. 38- Lee, J. Y., Seo, Y., Jeung, W., & Kim, J. H. (2017). How ambidextrous organizational culture affects job performance: A multilevel study of the mediating effect of psychological capital. Journal of Management and Organization, 38,1-16. 39- Lee, K., & Allen, N. J. (2002). Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of applied psychology, 87(1), 131-142. 40- March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization science, 2(1), 71-87. 41- Menguc, B., & Auh, S. (2008). The asymmetric moderating role of market orientation on the ambidexterity–firm performance relationship for prospectors and defenders. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(4), 455-470. 42- Mihalache, M., & Mihalache, O. R. (2016). Organizational ambidexterity and sustained performance in the tourism industry. Annals of Tourism Research, 56, 142-144. 43- Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied psychology, 79(4), 475-480. 20 44- Motowidlo, S., Borman, W., & Schmit, M. (1997). A Theory of Individual Differences in Task and Contextual Performance. Human Performance, 10 (2), 71-83. 45- Onyeizugbe Chinedu, U., Orogbu Obiageli, L., & Asiegbu Onyinye, B. (2016). Ambidexterity and Employee Performance of Selected Commercial Banks in Anambra State of Nigeria. Pyrex Journal of Business and Finance Management Research, 2(7),58-64 46- O'Reilly 3rd, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2004). The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, 82(4), 74-81. 47- Osman, S., Shariff, S. H., & Lajin, M. N. A. (2016). Does Innovation Contribute to Employee Performance? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 571-579. 48- Özmen, N. I. (2005). Leadership style of Turkish middle level managers in private sector and its relationship with subordinate performance, satisfaction and commitment. Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Turkey. 49- Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2018). A joint analysis of determinants and performance consequences of ambidexterity. Business Research Quarterly, 21(2), 84-98. 50- Raisch, S., and Birkinshaw, J. (2008) ‘Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents, Outcomes, and Moderators. Journal of Management, 34: 375– 409. 51- Raisch, S., Birkinshaw, J. Probst, G., & Tushman, M. L. (2009). Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance. Organization Science, 20(4), 685-695. 52- Reaves, A. C. (2015). Work creativity as a dimension of job performance. Doctoral dissertation, Florida International University. 53- Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 956–974. 54- Rotundo, M., & Sackett, P. R. (2002). The relative importance of task, citizenship and counterproductive performance to global ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of applied psychology, 87(1), 66-80. 55- Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Master thesis, Burlington University. 56- SadiNoglu, E., & Zehir, C. (2010). Investigating the effects of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of TurNish firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 127 (1),13-26. 57- Saunders, M., Thornhill, A., & Lewis, P. (2009). Research Methods for Business Students. Pearson education Limited, England. 58- Simpson, M. (2010). Factors related to job performance and job satisfaction in certified nursing assistants. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, Baltimore. 21 59- Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29. 60- Van Scotter, J. R. (2000). Relationships of task performance and contextual performance with turnover, job satisfaction, and affective commitment. Human resource management review, 10(1), 79-95. 61- Venkatraman, N., Lee, C. H., & Iyer, B. (2007). Strategic ambidexterity and sales growth: A longitudinal test in the software sector. In Unpublished Manuscript (earlier version presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, 2005). 62- Volberda, H. W., & Lewin, A. Y. (2003). Co‐evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co‐evolution. Journal of management studies, 40(8), 2111-2136. 63- Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617. 64- Zhang, H., Wu, F., & Cui, A. S. (2015). Balancing market exploration and market exploitation in product innovation: A contingency perspective. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(3), 297-308. 65- Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2003). Awakening employee creativity: The role of leader emotional intelligence. The leadership quarterly,14(4-5),545-568.