Methods of Estimating Non-Response of Multi-Auxiliary Information

Mohamed Al-metwaly, Ehab; Mohamed Almongy, Hisham

doi:10.21608/alat.2018.207006

Methods of Estimating Non-Response of Multi-Auxiliary Information

نوع المستند : المقالة الأصلية

المؤلفون

¹ Higher Institute of computer and Management information systems

² faculty of comerce - mansoura university

10.21608/alat.2018.207006

المستخلص

Abstract Sampling methods are often accompanied by sampling errors in collecting data. They are associated with design the chosen sample which can be handled in some way or another based on theoretically known styles in this field or by using the comprehensive census type. However, the people concerned with preparing and implementing statistical work face non random errors. Which are not less dangerous than errors connected with sampling methods. Whether what has been chosen partially of the population or by containing all items. These non random errors weakens the collected data efficiency. Because it is difficult to discover or to known: That is due to non-technical methods to handle them. In this paper focuses on the estimation of non-response of multi-auxiliary information of a finite population and infinite population. A comparison study is made between three methods of estimation using multi-auxiliary information; these methods are multi-mean imputation, multi-ratio method of imputation and multi-power transformation method of imputation, through randomized response technique. The relative efficiency was used to conclude the best methods by using empirically study (real data and simulation).

المراجع

REFERENCES 1. Almongy, H. (2012). Advances in some statistical methods to increase the efficiency of post-enumeration survey. H. D. Degree, Applied Statistics and Insurance Dep. Faculty of Commerce-Mansoura University. 2. Bratley, P., Fox, B. L., & Schrage, L. E. (2011). A guide to simulation. Springer Science & Business Media. 3. Cochran, W. G., & William, G. (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 4. Garcia MR, Cebrian AA (1996) Repeated substitution method: The ratio estimator for the population variance. Metrika, 43,101-105. 5. Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2010). Applied statistics and probability for engineers. John Wiley & Sons. 6. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear statistical models (Vol. 4, p. 318). Chicago: Irwin. 7. Olkin, I. (1958). Multivariate ratio estimation for finite populations. Biometrika, 45(1/2), 154-165. 8. Rao, J. N., & Sitter, R. R. (1995). Variance estimation under two-phase sampling with application to imputation for missing data. Biometrika, 82(2), 453-460. - 18 - 9. Singh, S., & Horn, S. (2000). Compromised imputation in survey sampling. Metrika, 51(3), 267-276. 10. Singh, S. (2000). Estimation of variance of regression estimator in two phase sampling. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 50(1-2), 49-64. 11. Singh, S. (2001). Generalized calibration approach for estimating variance in survey sampling. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 53(2), 404-417. 12. Singh, S., & Deo, B. (2003). Imputation by power transformation. Statistical Papers, 44(4), 555-579. 13. Srivastava, S. K. (1967). An estimator using auxiliary information in sample surveys. Calcutta Statistical Association Bulletin, 16(2-3), 121-132.